|
Article I Section 10 mandates:
"No State shall pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility."
Attainder, according to Noal Webster’s 1828 American Dictionary of the English Language says: “to corrupt, attaint; also conviction; and to stain; literally a staining, corruption, or rendering impure; a corruption of blood. Hence, the judgment of death, or sentence of a competent tribunal upon a person convicted of treason or felony, which judgment attaints, taints or corrupts his blood, so that he can no longer inherit lands. The consequences of this judgment are, forfeiture of lands, tenements and hereditaments, loss of reputation, and disqualification to be a witness in any court of law. A statue of Parliament attainting a criminal is called an act of attainder.
It is also important to note that the police, attorneys, judges and all other so-called elected public officials are not our enemies; they too are victims of this FRAUD. The whole system is a house of cards that will very shortly come crashing down. It’s time for us to assume our rightful stations and dispel the evil of domestic violence, which has divided our families. Ignorance is our enemy! It’s time to wake up and tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth so help us God.
Congress has given us the way out. Our problem is that we haven’t known how Congress operates and sits in two capacities. Each and every member wears two hats: a constitutional hat on behalf of the freely associated states, and a local hat on behalf of the residents of the District of Columbia, both of which are expressly done according to the constitution.
In fact, all laws are written according to whichever hat they are wearing, we just didn’t know when they were switching them. This will become more visible as we go on and when you begin to see the bigger picture for what it really is an “illusion.”
The Constitution is an Express Trust
Our Forefathers researched all types of governments, from democracies to republics. They wanted to create the most “perfect form” of government and pass it to their Heirs/Posterity.
The information revealed in Burness J. Speakman’s “Legacy I and II” is why I believe the Constitution is a “trust.” But, I believe Jerry Richey’s label-codicil information prompted her to research the topics of “trusts” and “wills” and further inspired her to write “Legacy I and II.” The following is just a little from her Legacy I and II writings, as nobody can say it better than Speakman herself.
The Constitution of the United States was bequeathed to us, as the posterity in the Preamble. The Preamble is not just an announcement. Webster’s 1828 defines Preamble:
1. Something previous; introduction to a discourse or writing.
2. The introductory part of a statute, which states the reasons and intent of the law.
At the time, nothing could be passed on to an heir without falling under one of the two statutes listed below;
A Quote from the Statute of Wills, [St. 34 & 35 Hen. VII (1542-1543) Ch.5] “Persons…shall have full and free liberty, power and authority to give, dispose, will or devise to any person or persons (Except bodies politick and corporate) by his last will and testament in writing, or otherwise by any act or acts lawful executed in his life”…
Hereditaments could only be passed to a body politic, “we the people” and the peoples’ “posterity,” by way of Trust, as shown in: The Statute of Uses [St 27 Hen, VIII (1536) Ch. 10]
“…that where any person or persons stand or be seised, or at any time hereafter shall happen to be seised of…etc…or other hereditaments, to the use, confidence or trust of any other person or persons, or body politic.”…
The Constitution cannot be a will, as you can see by the aforementioned statutes, as it passed hereditaments to a body politic. The bodies politic are “we the people” and the peoples’ “posterity.” Webster’s 1828 defines hereditaments as:
“Any species of property that may be inherited; lands, tenements, any thing corporeal or incorporeal, real, personal or mixed, that may descend to an heir. Blackstone
A corporeal hereditament is visible and tangible; an incorporeal hereditament is an ideal right, existing in contemplation of law, issuing out of substantial corporeal property.”
“We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”
The Preamble describes an estate held in trust. Don’t we say that our elected officials hold an office of Public Trust? That’s because the Constitution of the United States created a trust.
Trust is defined by Webster’s 1828 in three sets of definitions. In the first set under number 12, “trust” is defined as:
“In law, an estate, devised or granted in confidence that the devisee or grantee shall convey it, or dispose of the profits, at the will of another; an estate held for the use of another.”
Webster’s 1828 defines “estate” in 6 as: “The general business or interest of government; hence, a political body’ a commonwealth; a republic. But in this sense, we now use state.”
The Requisites of an Express Trust
1. It must have a competent Settlor and a Trustee. (“We the People”)
2. It must have an ascertainable trust res. (the “Blessings of Liberty”)
3. It must show sufficiently certain beneficiaries.(“ourselves and our posterity”)
4. A trust comes into being only upon execution of an intention to create it by the party (ies) having legal and equitable control of the subject matter of the trust.
Our Forefathers were competent Settlors and had equitable control of the subject matter as the representatives of the People. The trustees and their duties are defined and established within the Articles of the Constitution. The Preamble and Constitution ascertain the trust res being passed on in the phrase, “the Blessings of Liberty.” The Preamble and the Constitution show sufficient certain beneficiaries in the phrase, “to ourselves and our posterity.”
The Preamble states an intention for which the document was created as: “In order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general welfare and secure the Blessings of Liberty.”
Does it show an intention to manifest? Yes. “Do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.” In a set of encyclopedias called American Jurisprudence 2d in volume 76, Section 15 states:
“An express trust, as they sometimes are called, are “direct” trusts, and are those trusts intentionally created by the direct and positive act of the settlor, by some writing, deed, or will, or oral declaration.”
Our Forefathers were highly educated and knew about Trusts, Hereditaments, Conveyances, Fraud, Wills and Uses. Their knowledge was implemented in drafting the Constitution, because of the Statute of Frauds.
“[St. 29 Chas. II (1676) Ch. III] 1. For prevention of many fraudulent practices, … 6. And moreover, no devise in writing of (etc.) or hereditaments…shall.. be revocable, otherwise than by some other will or codicil in writing, or other writing declaring the same… (2) but all devises and bequests of lands and tenements shall remain and continue in force, until the same be burned, cancelled torn or obliterated by the testator, or his directions, in manner aforsaid, or unless the same be altered by some other will or codicil in writing, or writing of the devisor, signed in the presence of three or four witnesses, declaring the same; any former law or usage to the contrary notwithstanding.”
Wills are discussed in this section, and then at the end, it includes uses (trusts), but this underlined phrase shows that any will or trust created under any former law does not apply here.
The Statute Against Collusive and Fraudulent Conveyances prohibited any underhanded intent behind a conveyance of hereditaments.
“]St. 27 Eliz I (1585) Ch. 4] “the Queens most excellent Majesty,…(etc.) and Bodies Politick, …may have, incur and receive great loss and prejudice by reason of fraudulent conveyances, (and etc.) (by way of) …(3) secret intent of the parties the same to be to their own proper use, and at their free disposition, (4) coloured nevertheless by fained countenance and shew of words and sentences, as though the same were made bona fide, …” “said former conveyance, … Shall be deemed, taken and adjudged to be void, frustrate, and of none effect, by virtue and force of this present act.”
Statute of Enrollments.
“[St. Hen VIII (1536) Ch. 16] “Be it enacted…no manners, lands, tenement, or other hereditaments, shall pass … except … (such shall) … be made by writing indented, sealed, and enrolled in one of the King’s courts of record at Westminster, (2) or else within the same county or counties where the same manors, lands, or tenements, so bargained and sold, lie or be…”
Our laws regarding Trusts are derived from the English Common Law and the Restatement of Trusts. The Restatement is just a restatement of the English “Use” (trust) Statutes.
“Restatement, Second Trusts § 2 ..is a fiduciary relationship with respect to property, subject in the person by whom title to the property is held to equitable duties to deal with the property for the benefit of another person which arises as a result of a manifestation of an intention to create it.”
The “Bill of Rights” was not included in the Constitution (1787), because it also created an Independent Trust Res and was added four years later in 1791. It was annexed to the Constitution by way of codicil, as the amended intentions or afterthought of our Forefathers. When our Forefathers died, it became “Their Will.” Webster’s 1828 defines “codicil” as: “A writing by way of supplement to a will.”
Webster’s 1828 defines “will” in two sets of definitions. In the first set, under number 1 and 8 “will” is defined as:
- “That faculty of the mind by which we determine either to do or forbear an action; the faculty which is exercised in deciding, among two or more objects, which we shall embrace or pursue. The will is directed or influenced by the judgment. The understanding or reason compares different objects, which operate as motives; the judgment determines which is preferable, and the will decides which to pursue. In other words, we reason with respect to the value or importance of things; we then judge which is to be preferred; and we will to take the most valuable. These are but different operations of the mind, soul, or intellectual part of man. Great disputes have existed respecting the freedom of the will.
8. Testament; the disposition of a man’s estate, to take effect after his death. Wills are written, or nuncupative, that is, verbal.”
Under Article V of the Constitution are the procedures for any additional amendments to be added to the original Constitutional Trust. The “Bill of Rights” was the amended intentions of our Forefathers to place further restrictive clauses and limitations upon the government. These were added four years later, which would be necessary to show that a trust had already been created.
According to the laws existing at the time our Forefathers drafted the Constitution, it is clearly evident that they intended to create a trust. This Union of States created an Estate, a Republic-In-Form of Government, held in trust, to be passed on to the posterity. The Constitution is our legacy and we are the beneficiaries. It was bequeathed to us, as the posterity, in the Preamble.
The Constitution created a fourteenth government, which is just as foreign to the thirteen original states, as they are foreign to each other. This fourteenth government was set up under Roman Civil Law, as an international entity. It had to be set up this way in order to deal with the rest of the world commercially. The entire world is being regulated under Roman Civil Law by the international bankers, and with the changing of words and phrases, America has been duped into accepting this same form of international treatment.
Congress was given the power to regulate commerce under Article 1, Section 8, clause 2 and that’s the only power “we the people” gave to Congress. But due to various events occurring long before we were born, which we will go into, this power has been perverted.
Words in the old English sections are not misspelled.
|
